When Statistics Canada released its latest count of students, the biggest jump was not in kindergarten. It was in Grade 12, up 5.4 per cent in a single year, while kindergarten classes shrank (Statistics Canada, 2026).
This digest covers four pieces of research released between October 2026 and today, November 4, 2026. One is Canadian: a Statistics Canada release on who is enrolled in elementary and secondary schools. Three come from the United States: two University of Chicago studies on why some schools keep students coming to class, a Carnegie Mellon essay on tutoring that splits the work between people and AI, and a Texas study of the four-day school week. Each has its own subject, but they keep circling the same two things: how much real learning time a student gets, and who is paying attention when that time starts to slip.
How Many Students Are in Canadian Schools? A Record, With the Growth Moving Up
On November 4, 2026, Statistics Canada released its count of elementary and secondary students for 2024/2025. Public school enrolment rose by about 86,300 students, or 1.6 per cent, to a record 5.5 million. That is still growth, but slower than the 2.3 per cent increase the year before. Counting private, independent and homeschooled students, total enrolment reached 6.1 million, and private and independent schools now hold 8.0 per cent of students, a new high and the fourth increase in a row (Statistics Canada, 2026).
The more telling change is where the growth sits. Enrolment in Grades 10 to 12 rose 3.6 per cent to a record 1.2 million, and Grade 12 alone grew 5.4 per cent. Junior kindergarten and kindergarten went the other way, down 1.1 per cent, and now make up 9.8 per cent of enrolment, the lowest share since 2009/2010. Schools also produced a record 355,000 graduates, up 5.5 per cent. Provinces grew at different speeds: Alberta led at 2.9 per cent and Saskatchewan followed at 2.8 per cent, Quebec slowed to 1.9 per cent from 3.4 per cent, and the Northwest Territories was the only jurisdiction where enrolment fell (Statistics Canada, 2026).
The release ties the pattern to population change. Canada's population grew 1.9 per cent in 2024, with 94.8 per cent of that growth coming from international migration, while the fertility rate fell to a record low of 1.25. Fewer young children are arriving, and larger cohorts are moving through high school. The staff picture is shifting as well: public schools employed 424,500 educators, and 14.3 per cent were 55 or older, the highest share since 2002/2003. Statistics Canada cautions that reporting practices differ between provinces, so comparisons need care. For families of teenagers, fuller senior grades can mean busier classes and guidance offices in the years that decide post-secondary applications. Spotting a shaky course in Grade 10, rather than Grade 12, leaves room to recover it before the marks that matter most.
What Keeps Students Showing Up? Two Chicago Studies Point to the School
Attendance has not bounced back since the pandemic. A University of Chicago Consortium on School Research team led by Elaine Allensworth followed more than 360,000 Chicago Public Schools students in Grades 6 to 11, before and after the pandemic. Average attendance in the middle grades fell from 95 to 91 per cent, and in high school from 90 to 84 per cent. The paper, released in November 2026 as EdWorkingPaper 26-1631, also cites national US estimates: chronic absenteeism, meaning missing 10 per cent or more of school days, rose from about 15 per cent of students before the pandemic to over 28 per cent in 2022, and was still about 22 per cent in 2024-25 (Allensworth et al., 2026).
Average attendance in Chicago Public Schools, before and after the pandemic
Share of enrolled days attended. Source: Allensworth et al., EdWorkingPaper 26-1631, November 2026
Chicago is unusual because school choice means students from the same neighbourhood attend many different schools, which let the researchers separate the school from the street. The school mattered more. After the pandemic, 15.3 per cent of the variation in high school attendance lay between schools, compared with about 5 per cent between neighbourhoods. Even after accounting for students' past attendance and background, typical high schools spanned a range of 9.0 percentage points. The school mattered most for students who had attended least in the past. One measure stood out in high schools: where teachers reported trust with parents one standard deviation above average, attendance was two to three percentage points higher (Allensworth et al., 2026).
A companion paper from the same group, released in October 2026 as EdWorkingPaper 26-1628, looked closely at four Chicago high schools with better attendance than expected. They shared four habits: frequent and timely outreach to families, close monitoring of attendance data, chances to recover missed work paired with clear expectations for effort, and deliberate work to give students a voice in a safe, supportive climate. Across the district's high schools, quick contact with the family after an absence was linked to better attendance (Antony et al., 2026). Both are US working papers that have not yet been peer reviewed, and they describe associations rather than proven causes.
In Ontario, attendance now shows up on the report card. Since this fall, attendance and participation count for 15 per cent of the final mark in Grades 9 and 10 and 10 per cent in Grades 11 and 12, and students on excused absences are not penalized (CP24, 2026). The Chicago findings point to the plainest move being the most useful one: stay in touch with the school when your teen misses class, and ask early how the missed work can be made up. Our guide to Ontario's attendance rules for high school grades explains how the new marks work.
What Is Hybrid Human-AI Tutoring?
Four researchers at Carnegie Mellon University, Tiffany Wu, Ashish Gurung, Kenneth Koedinger and Danielle Thomas, released an essay in November 2026 as EdWorkingPaper 26-1633 that names a fast-growing category: tutoring in which people and AI split the work on purpose. They start from an old problem. Recent meta-analyses put the average effect of tutoring at about 0.29 to 0.40 standard deviations, among the largest of any school intervention, but the effect shrinks as programs grow, and good tutoring is expensive. The authors call this an iron triangle of effectiveness, affordability and reach, where gaining one usually costs another (Wu et al., 2026).
The costs they cite are US figures. A national blueprint for high-impact tutoring estimated about $1,022 per student a year, with 83 per cent of the spending going to people. Saga Education's high-dosage model cost about $3,100 per student. A short-burst model cost $416 a year but produced smaller effects. Khanmigo's software cost $15 per student a year, yet in a randomized evaluation the median student used it on only a third of practice days. In another study, human tutors who encouraged students raised the use of an AI literacy platform by 71 to 80 per cent, though use stayed low overall and achievement did not improve (Wu et al., 2026).
What tutoring costs, people and AI (US figures)
| Model | Who delivers it | Cost per student a year (US) | What the essay notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| High-impact tutoring blueprint | People | about $1,022 | 83% of the cost is staff |
| Saga Education high-dosage tutoring | People | about $3,100 | Intensive model, 2015 to 2019 |
| Short-burst tutoring | People | $416 | Smaller effects than intensive tutoring |
| Khanmigo AI tutor (software) | AI | $15 | Median student used it on a third of practice days |
Figures as cited in Wu et al., EdWorkingPaper 26-1633, November 2026
The essay sorts hybrid models into four designs: AI tutors whose messages are reviewed by people, AI tutors backed by people who step in for motivation or a tricky explanation, schedules that alternate between software practice and small-group lessons with a person, and human tutors who get real-time suggestions from AI. It reports no new results of its own, and it is candid that the evidence for the newest AI tutors is thin: a Stanford review it cites found that only 20 of 800 papers on AI chatbot tutoring in K-12 offered strong causal evidence. The working conclusion is that AI can make practice and hints cheap, while people are still needed for motivation, relationship and accountability. For a parent weighing an app against a tutor, that suggests a simple test: who notices when your child stops trying? Our post on why one-on-one tutoring works looks at what a person adds.
Do Four-Day School Weeks Hurt Learning?
Texas changed its rules from a minimum number of school days to a minimum number of instructional minutes, which let districts fit the week into four longer days. The first districts switched in the 2019-20 school year, and by 2024-25, 176 Texas districts ran a four-day week, with school days 50 to 110 minutes longer than usual. Gabrielle Lohner and Justine Weng compared those districts with similar ones that kept five days, in EdWorkingPaper 26-1623, released in October 2026 (Lohner and Weng, 2026).
Districts mostly adopted the schedule to keep teachers, and it modestly worked. Teachers became 2.1 percentage points more likely to stay in their district the next year, mainly because fewer moved to other districts, and the four-day districts drew teachers with more experience and stronger records of raising scores. On average, the researchers found no evidence of harm to math or reading test scores. The exceptions are the useful part: districts that cut the most instructional minutes, and districts that were already low-performing before the switch, saw achievement fall (Lohner and Weng, 2026).
Four-day weeks are a US story, and Canadian provinces set their own school-year rules. The lesson still travels: what counts is the amount of real teaching a child gets, not the shape of the calendar. When a child loses learning time, through absences, illness or a hard stretch at home, it rarely evens out by itself. It comes back when someone plans to win it back.
What This Means for Families and Teachers
Read side by side, these studies keep returning to time and people. Senior grades are fuller. Attendance is lower than it was, and it is higher where teachers and parents trust each other and schools reach out quickly after an absence. Software can make practice cheap, but someone still has to notice when a student drifts. A shorter week did no harm only where the teaching minutes survived.
For parents, three questions are worth asking this term. How many classes has my child missed, and what did they cover? Who at school will tell me early if things start to slip? What is the plan to make up the work? If the answer to the last one is unclear, focused one-on-one help can close the specific gap before the semester ends. Connect Education matches families with a tutor for the subject and grade, online, at home or at a public library. Every tutor on Connect Education is a licensed teacher in good standing. You can browse certified tutors or tell us about your child to get matched.



